Week #15: 52 Ancestors – Brick Wall
Week #24: 52 Ancestors – Father’s Day
By Eilene Lyon
Since I’m not doing all 52 Ancestors prompts this year, what the heck, why not combine a couple?
Sometimes breaking down a brick wall is just a matter of finding a piece that doesn’t fit properly. Remove it and the wall crumbles and the way forward is clear.
I created a family tree for The Putterer quite a few years back. Seems fitting, since I took the name and became part of the family in 1999. But I have been stymied by his great-great-grandfather, Cyrus R. Lyon, Cyrus’s parents, and siblings.
Part of the problem stemmed from Cyrus having various birth years, depending on the record. The last record for Cyrus, the 1870 census, suggests he was born in 1834.1 The 1865 New York census: 1831.2 The 1863 Civil War Draft: 1832.3 The 1860 census: 1833.4
A key document to determine his birth family is the 1850 census, when he would have been 16-19 years old. I had saved a record for Cyrus Lyon, son of Aaron Eaton Lyon and Miranda, with two younger sisters, Emily and Mira Ann. His age was 16, suggesting a birth year of 1834, matching the 1870 census.
Aaron and family lived next door to a couple old enough to be his parents: Abram J. and Mary Lyon. And on the other side of this couple, Ebenezer and Lucy Lyon with their children.5 Ebenezer could be Aaron’s younger brother by two years.
Problem one: Aaron, Miranda, Emily, and Mira Ann Lyon seemingly vanish after 1850. No records tie them to the Abram J. Lyon family. Problem two: Cyrus appears to have died after 1870, but before 1875, when his wife is listed in the New York census as a widow.6 I know from experience that it’s possible they divorced.
I found an 1880 census record for a Cyrus R. Lyon (his name, with or without the middle initial, is fairly common in central New York State).7 He was born in 1834 and living with his sister and brother-in-law. But the sister’s name is Mary, not Emily. And records suggest that Mary’s parents were John and Betsey Lyon, not Aaron and Miranda. Wrong Cyrus.
Let’s go back to that 1850 census record and take a closer look.

Note that the three Lyon families are listed consecutively. But after Aaron Eaton and his family, we see ditto marks, making it appear that Lyon is their last name. Census-taker error rears its ugly head. The last name of this family is actually Eaton! A search for the family under that name reveals them living in the same town in 1860 (though Aaron has a new wife).8
After deleting Aaron’s family from my tree, I took a closer look at Cyrus’s remaining records to find a clue about his life before 1860. I put together this table to visualize the information (okay, I put the table together later for this blog post):

The fact that jumped out at me: Cyrus was born in Chenango County. It suggests that he probably lived in the county his entire life. Looking in the 1850 census for a Lyon family in Chenango County turned up a record for the family of Daniel and Harriet Lyon. Their oldest son is listed as Ralph, age 19 (born 1831).9 Yes, Cyrus was listed by his middle name!

Additional research turned up the 1855 New York census for this family, and Cyrus R. Lyon is listed as age 24, still living with his parents.10 A probate record shows that Daniel’s father was also a Cyrus. There may be documentation for this lineage going back to the immigrant ancestor, something I will be exploring later. Very, very carefully.

Not only did I find the right father for Cyrus R. Lyon, but also his grandfather, mother, siblings, and possibly many ancestors. (And The Putterer’s second cousin, for that matter.)
As for a death record for Cyrus, I am still searching, but it seems probable that Lucy really was a widow in 1875. She remarried in 1877.
*In 1859, Cyrus R. Lyon bought a town lot in the village of Otselic from a man named Arton P. Ford.11 I haven’t determined the connection between the two men, but it appears that Cyrus named his only child Arton F. Lyon. Later the name changed to Arlon for unknown reasons.



Feature image: Otselic Township in Chenango County, New York. (Wikimedia Commons)
- Cyrus Lyon. Year: 1870; Census Place: Otselic, Chenango, New York; Roll: M593_917; Page: 333A – via Ancestry.com. ↩
- C R Lyon. Ancestry.com. New York, U.S., State Census, 1865 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014. ↩
- Cyrus R Lyon. Consolidated Lists of Civil War Draft Registrations, 1863-1865. NM-65, entry 172, 620 volumes. NAI: 4213514. Records of the Provost Marshal General’s Bureau (Civil War), Record Group 110. National Archives at Washington D.C. – via Ancestry.com. ↩
- Cyras Lyon. Year: 1860; Census Place: Otselic, Chenango, New York; Page: 36 – via Ancestry.com. ↩
- Aaron Eaton Lyon. Year: 1850; Census Place: Rushford, Allegany, New York; Roll: 476; Page: 353b – via Ancestry.com. ↩
- Lucy Lyon. Ancestry.com. New York, U.S., State Census, 1875 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2013. ↩
- Cyrus R. Lyon. Year: 1880; Census Place: Attica, Wyoming, New York; Roll: 948; Page: 32B; Enumeration District: 197 – via Ancestry.com ↩
- Aaron Eaton. Year: 1860; Census Place: Rushford, Allegany, New York; Page: 837 – via Ancestry.com. ↩
- Ralph Lyon. Year: 1850; Census Place: Lincklaen, Chenango, New York; Roll: 487; Page: 74a – via Ancestry.com. ↩
- Cyrus R Lyon. Ancestry.com. New York, U.S., State Census, 1855 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2013. ↩
- Chenango County Deed Book 121, p. 150 – via Family Search. ↩
Great catch on the surname error! Between enumerator errors, reporting errors, and indexing errors, relying on census records can be a nightmare. On the other hand, what would we do without them!
LikeLiked by 2 people
They are such a crucial resource, but can be so unreliable, too. Just that one mark after Aaron’s name led to so much confusion. I need to remember to correct it in Ancestry.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This always fascinates me! Well done
LikeLiked by 2 people
It’s important to explore where we went wrong…
LikeLiked by 2 people
The use of middle names was rather common though, wasn’t it?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I suppose it was. I haven’t studied it. Many people still didn’t have middle names then.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oooh…that’s a good point. I know my grandfather who was born about 1905 had a middle name, I don’t know how many others did
LikeLiked by 1 person
Naming conventions are actually an interesting area of study.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I find it funny that no one is a junior anymore, here in the city at least.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think our culture has bent toward unique names for individuals. Naming for parents or ancestors is stodgy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Though….funny story. In kindergarten my daughters class had to do a thing about their names, why chosen, etc. and it was put on a bulletin board. All the kids had these stories, it’s an ancestor name, it’s biblical, etc. and my daughters said “ I was named after an actress”….😆
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a good one. I think that happens a lot more now. People used to name their sons after presidents or even famous outlaws.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah…as long as no kardashian naming…
LikeLiked by 1 person
😆😆
LikeLiked by 1 person
When I was growing up in northern Vermont, there were men who were always called by their father’s name, even though their own name was something entirely different. Good luck with their descendents trying to figure who was who and one who or two!
LikeLiked by 1 person
That sounds even worse than actually having your father’s name!
LikeLiked by 1 person
😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Another fascinating piece of detective work!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fortunately, I worked out the problem fairly quickly. But there was some time spent on unproductive leads.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Brick by brick? No kidding! The only difference being, you somehow navigate an almost two-hundred year old census, which deserves big props all by its lonesome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Having the online tools makes it a pretty simple matter these days. My grandmothers had to work so much harder to get those records.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You ain’t wrong about that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fascinating work you do. It is like having a few puzzles mixed together and then trying to find the pieces that fit!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It can be tricky sometimes. It’s usually missing records that are more of a problem than the ones you find.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is fascinating research, I can imagine the satisfaction of your “aha! moment” when you spotted the error, and things just opened up for discovery.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Irene. Yes, that little ditto mark niggled at the back of my mind a while.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your patience and tenacity are impressive, Eilene. Good luck with your studies ahead.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fortunately, I find the challenge absolutely absorbing.😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Surnames can be tricky, as you demonstrate here. I know that different spellings make for trouble, let alone just being the wrong folks. I don’t know of anyone in my family history who was a madder manufacturer and rather like that job description. Fascinating story as usual.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What? No madders in your tree? How can it be?😆
Yes, Lyon is a pretty common name, unlike my maiden name of Halse, which is very rare.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wonderful research, Eilene. When you’re back on an 1850 census, I have to wonder how educated the census takers were. Do you know the requirements at that time?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I haven’t looked into that. Literate, at least!
LikeLiked by 1 person
And I wonder what “literate” meant in those days haha.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, spelling sure wasn’t a thing!
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL I know!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you for walking us through your research, Eilene. You incorporate several common situations that can lead to confusion and errors on a family tree. I’m glad your diligence paid off!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Glad to have you stop by. I get a lot of pleasure from researching and writing these stories.
LikeLiked by 1 person