Week 14: #52 Ancestors – Brick Wall
By Eilene Lyon
For this project, I decided to write about my 4th great-grandparents, Samuel and Eliza Drake of Killyleagh, County Down, Northern Ireland. It turned mammoth, so I’ve split it into three parts.
I long ago determined that these are the parents of Eliza Jane Halse (my 3rd great-grandmother), but all the evidence was circumstantial: Eliza J. Halse crossed the ocean with Samuel and Eliza Drake in 1850; she lived with them in Smithfield, Rhode Island, in the 1850 census; she moved with Samuel (Eliza presumably having died) to Iowa about 1857; she took responsibility for Samuel at the end of his life, as a dutiful daughter would.
But the Drake family has posed more questions than answers in my research. When and where did Eliza Drake die and where was she buried? What was her maiden name? Who were all the other Drakes living with Samuel and Eliza in 1850? Were they children or could they be nieces and nephews? When did Samuel die and where was he buried?
I decided to revisit my research on this couple and the younger generation and see if I’d missed some vital clue. Indeed, I had. And it turned out to answer most of those questions and help me “reunite” the Drake family.
Immigration to America
Complicating my Drake research was the fact that these people never gave consistent ages. They varied radically. When Samuel and Eliza Drake arrived in New York City in May 1850, they gave their ages as 40.1 A few months later, they reported their ages as 58 and 56, respectively, probably closer to true.2 The younger generation was just as bad.
When Samuel and Eliza immigrated, only two of their children were married, Eliza J. Halse and Mary Ann Murphy. The Murphy family immigrated separately the same year.3 Apparently, the other Drakes also immigrated separately and they all gathered in Smithfield.
In 1850, there were 16 people in the Drake/Halse household, a few of them apparently unrelated (the Fitzsimmons family and Hugh Young). The additional Drakes included: Samuel, Richard (who immigrated with Samuel and Eliza), Martha (“Matha”), Thomas, and William. They could all be children of the older couple, based on their ages.2 Were they?
In October 1855, a Samuel Drake purchased three land parcels from the government in Winneshiek County, Iowa.4 The following year, Iowa did a census that showed the younger Samuel Drake living with his (presumed) brother-in-law, William Murphy, along with William’s 8-year-old son, William D. Murphy, and nephew, Richard Halse, then 9 years old.5
Because there are two Samuel Drakes, I will refer to them as Sr. and Jr., though they did not use those terms. It appears that the land patents belonged to Samuel, Jr. Eventually, Robert Halse, William Murphy, and William and Richard Drake (as partners) ended up with some portions of these properties.
A Gold Rush Miner?
A descendant of William Drake, Earl Drake (he who rescued the Dexter Cemetery in South Dakota), did quite a bit of research on the Drake-Halse-Murphy families.
Earl had this to say about his ancestor:
“Story is that William got into a quarrel with his family in Ireland as a young man, climbed out the upstairs window without saying goodbye and went to the coast, joining the Merchant Marines. Eventually he ended up in the Bay of San Francisco about the time for the 1849 Gold Rush, jumped ship and joined the miners. He and a couple partners did not find gold, but found or worked in a silver mine, making up to $200 a day, which was an enormous sum in 1849. However, it was all spent on gambling and women in the mining towns.”
It’s difficult to determine if there’s any truth to this. The fact he was in Rhode Island in August 1850 and the mention of silver mining make it suspect. No one was looking for anything other than gold in California in 1849.
In 2012, I visited the Winneshiek County courthouse to find family records, but not being experienced then, I relied on the local genealogical society to tell me what records I should ask for. I missed some by not doing my own research. Now those records are available on Family Search, but only by going to a Family History Center (FHC).
Our local FHC is only open on Tuesdays from 11 – 2. Sometimes I can con talk the docent into opening at other times, which she graciously did for me on Wednesday. I wanted to look through the probate and land records to see if I could learn more about Samuel Drake, Sr. The probate index had a record for Samuel Drake – but when I looked at it, it was probated in early 1860, and I knew Samuel, Sr. was still alive in 1862.
A Willful Will
This record was for Samuel, Jr.! And it included a very unusual holographic will. Between the will and the other probate court records, I was finally able to establish that all those Drakes were, in fact, the children of Samuel and Eliza.6 (Sound of bricks crashing to the ground.)
His will named all of his siblings – including “Martha James Connary” in New York City – except Thomas (who remained in Smithfield), and Mary Ann Murphy. In the probate proceedings, Samuel Drake, Sr. “father of the deceased” appeared, as well as Mary Ann.7
Samuel Drake, Jr. wrote out a will on a single sheet of paper on December 28, 1858. He stated that he was 41 years old. Two unrelated people signed as witnesses.6 It seems a bit odd for a single, childless man that age to be writing a will. He must have been in poor health and known he had not long to live – possibly ill with tuberculosis.
Strangely, he used the terms of his will as an attempt to coerce two of his younger brothers: William and Richard. Thrice, he specified that he wished to give them (jointly) some of his land and personal property, but only “…if my said Brothers shall return home within fifteen months of this date…”6
William and Richard were both single and apparently adventurous. Where were they in 1858? California or Nevada? Silver mining was more likely around then, so it’s plausible.
Samuel, Jr. was dead just thirteen months later. William did return to Iowa to claim the land, but Richard never did. Perhaps he smelled the winds of war coming and he headed to Canada, never to return.
To be continued…
Feature image: View from Killyleagh Castle (Wikimedia Commons)
- Samuel Drake. Year: 1850; Arrival: New York, New York; Microfilm Serial: M237, 1820-1897; Microfilm Roll: Roll 088; Line: 5; List Number: 441 – via Ancestry.com. ↩
- Samuel Drake. Year: 1850; Census Place: Smithfield Districts 2 and 3, Providence, Rhode Island; Roll: M432_846; Page: 118B; Image: 243 – via Ancestry.com. ↩ ↩
- Mary A Murphy. Year: 1900; Census Place: Dexter, Codington, South Dakota; Page: 7; Enumeration District: 0100; FHL microfilm: 1241548 – via Ancestry.com. ↩
- https://glorecords.blm.gov/results/default.aspx?searchCriteria=type=patent|st=IA|cty=191|ln=drake|fn=samuel|sp=true|sw=true|sadv=false ↩
- Samuel Darke [sic]. 1856. Pleasant, Winneshiek. Iowa. Ancestry.com. Iowa, State Census Collection, 1836-1925 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2007. ↩
- Winneshiek County Probate Book B. pp. 10-11 via Familysearch.org. ↩ ↩ ↩
- Winneshiek County Probate Book A. p. 174. 2 Apr 1860. via Familysearch.org ↩