Week 30: #52 Ancestors – Easy
By Eilene Lyon
(Satire)
Decades ago my paternal grandmother, Reatha Halse, gave me some ancestry information. It included a Halse-Drake-Murphy collection of family trees. Cousin Earl Drake compiled all these descendants from our immigrant ancestors for several generations. Handy dandy!
Her bundle also included a pedigree for her Crandall line, back to Elder John Crandall of Westerly, Rhode Island. An additional sheet went back from Elder John to Charlemagne. Wowsa! I’m descended from royalty. Way cool!

My maternal grandmother got in on the act, too. Clare “Bobby” Smith gifted me with her handwritten pedigree charts and other materials. They didn’t go back all that far. Ho hum. She included a fat typewritten transcript of letters from the California gold rush – extremely tedious reading, all those “thees” “thous” and names of people I’d never heard of.
But at least none of this required any work on my part. Right?
When I got more serious about my family tree, I made contact with a distant second cousin of my mom’s. “Distant” in the sense that no one ever heard of this branch of the family – heck, Mom doesn’t really know her first cousins hardly.
Forest sent me a floppy disk with 750 people on my maternal tree – Bonanza! What could be easier than dropping a GED file into Family Tree Maker? Add Daddy’s tree from Earl’s paperwork et víolà!! So simple. Child’s play, really.
Then along came Ancestry.com. Hey! All these other people have trees I can steal copy from and now I’ve got thousands of ancestors and relatives. Ain’t. It. Grand?? My work here is done. Ta da! Easy peasy.
As I was basking in the glory of my brilliant, shiny new family tree, I started exploring. Ya know, just to learn a bit about all these fab new ancestors of mine. Wait a minute…this whole Charlemagne thing was debunked years ago?!
Um. Are all these people really related to me?? Maybe I’d better start taking a closer look at all this information…
Feature image: Austin D on Unsplash
Floppy disk image: Fredy Jacob on Unsplash
I gave up on the Charlemagne thing, too.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Who needs royalty? Regular folks are plenty interesting.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Charlemagne was a pretty ruthless guy, so maybe it’s for the best!
LikeLiked by 3 people
I never really cared, honestly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, sounds like you have a labour of love ahead of you!
LikeLiked by 3 people
Oh, it’s been going on for years. This was intended to be tongue-in-cheek.😊
LikeLiked by 3 people
I still think your royalty…or I just think royally of you hehe. Royal something, anyway.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s a lovely sentiment. I’m starting to think my little attempt at satire should be tied to a concrete block and thrown in the nearest lake. 😕
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well that would make a lovely discovery for future generations combing through the microfish [sic] Of the royal Eilene…
LikeLiked by 1 person
😆
LikeLike
Let the satire live a long and happy life!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Maybe I’ll write a decent one someday.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This one is perfectly respectable. (I liked it very much!)
LikeLiked by 2 people
🤗
LikeLike
I also have inherited those pages of trees from my mother’s side of the family, along with several interminable lists of “begats.” Not a single reliable citation in the lot.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Genealogy is a great hobby, but not everyone wants to do the hard work of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As my mother noted the other day, that’s a retirement project for me when I have the time needed to do it properly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We’re lucky that so many resources are available online. Grandma Smith did all her research the hard way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So that explains the regal nature about you! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
You forgot to add “Your royal highness”
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re not the first person to tell me that they descended from Charlemagne. It’s not that I don’t want to believe you, and it is possible, but what are the odds of so many Charlemagne cousins knowing me, but not each other?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I am not descended from Charlemagne or any other royalty.
LikeLike
☺️ And yet I like you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The odds, as you might say, are good, because the goods are odd.
LikeLiked by 2 people
And I like you, too. (And you tricky response – which I should have read more carefully.) 😳
LikeLiked by 1 person
😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought I could write satire without labeling it, but I’ve gone back and made note of it at the beginning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t forget Poe’s Law!
LikeLike
And Brandolini’s law:
The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That I can relate to!!!
LikeLike
Don’t know it, but I know I’m never half as clever as I think I am. 🤔
LikeLike
Hahaha! You know, I bet if we paid enough money, we could “discover” many a royal relation! But I’m with you, the regular folk seem much more interesting. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve seen people trace their trees to Adam. Guess I really can’t compete with that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, are we not all Adam’ s children? 😂
Wait, then we are all related to Charlemagne, yay! 😄
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, wait, we’re all related to Santa Claus (or is it Attila the Hun?) 😆
LikeLiked by 1 person
🥳🤪😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
My husband is descended from that same Crandall line…I’m still working on that one. My father-in-law passed along their “official 100% correct” (and unsourced) family tree…it looks a lot like what you’ve shared here! I’ve tried to explain that it has errors, but you know how that goes.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know there’s a large book about the Crandalls and I have copies of some pages, but I’ve never reviewed the entire line to see all the evidence.
LikeLike
How did I know that punch line was coming 😂😂😂. And …. once again WordPress seems to have “unfollowed” you on my behalf, will their bugs never get squashed? I’ve refollowed, apologies for the silence.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Don’t we sometimes wish genealogy was so simple? Personally, I love the challenges.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You probably are descended from Charlemagne (though maybe not by way of that particular path). They say just about everyone with European ancestry is.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The big problem in genealogy is the “they say”s. Charlemagne undoubtedly has many descendants, and it is true that family trees begin compacting as you go back in time, but this does not lead to convergence on “one” (more likely two😉) person unless you go back many millennia. Charlemagne is too recent for that kind of gene spread. Some confusion may come about because he has been called “The Father of Europe” meaning that he unites much of it politically. Also, most royal families in Europe can trace their trees back to him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
By “they say” I meant this article: https://www.theguardian.com/science/commentisfree/2015/may/24/business-genetic-ancestry-charlemagne-adam-rutherford. Quite interesting!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the link. It does explain some technical things well. He also makes some tortured constructions like “everyone alive in the ninth century who left descendants is the ancestor of every living European today,” which just adds confusion, not clarification. Not every person who was alive and had children in 1000 AD is my ancestor. As the author points out, it’s a numbers game. The reality of descendancy is that many populations were somewhat isolated and “breeding” went on in a closed fashion for a very long time. The same couple can be my 20th great-grandparents in 50 different ways. That’s a more probable scenario. If the other is true, I want to collect on my piece of the estate. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
This made me smile! I’m sure there are people who think it’s that easy. I know it’s not which is why I have never ventured beyond those files of family papers …
LikeLiked by 2 people
Beyond the challenges is the fact of just how time-consuming it becomes!
LikeLiked by 1 person